Eficácia da utilização da técnica de ablação mecanoquímica no tratamento e cicatrização rápida de úlcera venosa crônica: relato de caso e revisão de literatura
Efficacy of using the mechanochemical endovenous ablation to treat chronic venous ulcers: case report and literature review
Arthur Souza Magnani; Thiago Faiad Name Villari; Alexandre de Azevedo Melo; Marcela Juliano da Silva; Dafne Braga Diamante Leiderman
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
This case report presents the successful treatment of a 47-year-old male patient with a venous ulcer of the leg associated to deep and superficial venous insufficiency. The patient presented with a non-healing venous ulcer on his leg, ocher dermatitis and heaviness of the leg, which interfered with work activities. Duplex ultrasound revealed deep venous insufficiency (popliteal vein), incompetence of the great saphenous and indirect perforating veins. The treatment involved ablation of the great saphenous vein using Flebogrif®, a specific mechanochemical ablation device. Following the treatment, the patient experienced significant improvement in his symptoms and venous ulcer was completely healed 9 weeks after the procedure and one year after that. Duplex ultrasound performed after the treatment confirmed the successful closure of the great saphenous vein. This case report highlights the effectiveness of mechanochenical ablation in the management of venous ulcers, even when deep venous insufficiency is involved.
Keywords
References
1 Rybak Z, Janeczek M, Dobrzynski M, Wujczyk M, Czerski A, Kuropka P, et al. Study of Flebogrif ®: a new tool for mechanical sclerotherapy-effectiveness assessment based on animal model. Nanomaterials. 2021;11(2):544. http://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020544. PMid:33669987.
2 Bentes LGB, Lemos RS, Santos DR, Reis JMC. Perfil epidemiológico do tratamento cirúrgico de varizes no Brasil no período de 2010 a 2020. J Vasc Bras. 2022;21:1-7.
3 Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer JR, Engle JS, Schottenfeld D. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15(3):175-84.
4 De Maeseneer MG, Kakkos SK, Aherne T, et al. Editor’s Choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Venous Disease of the Lower Limbs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022;63(2):184-267.
5 Kikuchi R, Nhuch C, Drummond DAB, et al. Brazilian guidelines on chronic venous disease of the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Bras. 2023;22:e20230064.
6 Witte ME, Zeebregts CJ, de Borst GJ, Reijnen MMPJ, Boersma D. Mechanochemical endovenous ablation of saphenous veins using the ClariVein: a systematic review. Phlebology. 2017 Dec;32(10):649-57. http://doi.org/10.1177/0268355517702068. PMid:28403687.
7 Vähäaho S, Halmesmäki K, Mahmoud O, Albäck A, Noronen K, Venermo M. Three-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing mechanochemical and thermal ablation in the treatment of insufficient great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021;9(3):652-9.
8 Shadid N, Nelemans P, Lawson J, Sommer A. Predictors of recurrence of great saphenous vein reflux following treatment with ultrasound-guided foamsclerotherapy. Phlebology. 2015;30(3):194-9.
9 Lane T, Bootun R, Dharmarajah B, et al. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing radiofrequency and mechanical occlusion chemically assisted ablation of varicose veins – Final results of the Venefit versus Clarivein for varicose veins trial. Phlebology. 2017;32(2):89-98.
10 Holewijn S, van Eekeren RRJP, Vahl A, et al. Two-year results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing Mechanochemical endovenous Ablation to RADiOfrequeNcy Ablation in the treatment of primary great saphenous vein incompetence (MARADONA trial). J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019;7(3):364-74.
11 Vun SV, Rashid ST, Blest NC, Spark JI. Lower pain and faster treatment with mechanico-chemical endovenous ablation using ClariVein®. Phlebology. 2015;30(10):688-92.
12 Vos CG, Ünlü Ç, Bosma J, van Vlijmen CJ, de Nie AJ, Schreve MA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of two novel techniques of nonthermal endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg.: Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017;5(6):880-96.
13 Kim SY, Safir SR, Png CYM, et al. Mechanochemical ablation as an alternative to venous ulcer healing compared with thermal ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019;7(5):699-705.
14 Smith PC. Daflon 500 mg and venous leg ulcer: new results from a meta-analysis. Angiology. 2005;56(Suppl 1):S33-9.
Submitted date:
10/11/2024
Accepted date:
07/01/2025


